شناسایی عوامل موثر بر توانمندی شبکه‌سازی در مدیریت تحقیق و توسعه در صنایع با فنا وری پیشرفته هوافضا

الف. منابع فارسی

• آذر، عادل؛ غلامزاده،رسول و  قنواتی، مهدی (1391). مدلسازی مسیری-ساختاری در مدیریت: کاربرد نرم‌افزار Smart PLS. انتشارات نگاه دانش.
• خمسه، عباس (1397). شناسایی و بررسی عوامل کلیدی مؤثر بر رصد تکنولوژی‌های پیشرفته آینده در مراکز طراحی هوافضا.آینده پژوهی دفاعی,  2 (7), 152-129.
• خمسه، عباس و عصاری، محمد حسین (1398). مدیریت تحقیق و توسعه، انتشارات سرافراز.
• رادفر، رضا و خمسه، عباس (1387). تببین تأثیر شبکه‌سازی تحقیق و توسعه برای ساماندهی نوآوری باز در SME‌ها. فصلنامه تخصصی پارک و مراکز رشد، شماره 14.
• عصاری، محمدحسین (1399). ارائه مدل توانمندی‌های تحقیق ‌و توسعه در صنایع با تکنولوژی پیشرفته هوافضا. رساله دکتری رشته مدیریت تکنولوژی. استاد راهنما: دکتر عباس خمسه. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکزی.
• علیپور، علیرضا (۱۳۹۵). راهکارهای تحقق اقتصاد مقاومتی در صنعت هوافضا در گستره مهندسی سیستم، دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی یافته‌های نوین علوم و تکنولوژی. قم، مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات اسلامی سروش حکمت مرتضوی.
• نقی‌زاده، محمد؛ بامداد صوفی، جهانیار و میرافشار، مریم (1393). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی خطر‌های پروژه‌های همکاری فناوری (حوزه زیست‌فناوری). فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری.
• منطقی، منوچهر و حسن‌زاده، پریسا (1395). الزامات گذر از نوآوری بسته به نوآوری باز. فصلنامه رشد و فناوری.
• نیلفروشان، هادی و آراستی، محمدرضا (1392)‌. فرایند شکست ضعیف شبکه‌های نوآوری مهندسی شده در مرحله راه‌اندازی: مطالعه موردی صنعت گاز ایران. سیاست علم و فناوری.

ب. منابع انگلیسی

• Ashoumi, H., & Blonos, M. N. A. (2021). Google Classroom as an Online Learning Facility: Students Admission at MTs Al-Ihsan Jombang. SCHOOLAR: Social and Literature Study in Education, 1(1), 6-32.
• Blanchard, B. S. , Blyler, J. E., (2016). System Engineering Management. Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey.
• Camarinha-Matos, L.M., et al., (2009).Collaborative networked organizations–Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(1): p. 46-60.
• Ceglie, G. and Dini, M., (1999). SME cluster and network development in developing countries: the experience of UNIDO, paper presented at the international conference on building a modern and Effective Development Service Industry. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, march 2-5.
• Chen, J., Chen, Y.,Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362–373.
• Corsaro, D., Cantù, C. & Tunisini, A., (2012). Actors’ Heterogeneity in Innovation Networks. Industrial Marketing Management, Volume 41, pp. 780-789.
• DeFillippi, R. and J. Sydow, (2016). Project networks: Governance choices and paradoxical tensions. Project Management Journal, 47(5): p. 6-17.
• Dogbe, C.S.K., Tian, H., Pomegbe, W.W.K., Sarsah, S.A. and Otoo, C.O.A., (2020). Effect of network embeddedness on innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: The moderating role of innovation openness. Journal of Strategy and Management.
• Faccin K., Wegner D., Balestrin A., (2019). How to orchestrate R&D networks? The role of orchestration subprocesses and collaborative practices over time, Wiley: Creat Innov Manag.
• Ferrigno, G., Dagnino, G.B. and Di Paola, N., (2021). R&D alliance partner attributes and innovation performance: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
• Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.(1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Modeling with Unobserved ariables and Measurement Error; Journal of Marking Research,Vol.18, No.1, pp.39-50.
• Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (2005). A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example. Communications of AIS, 16 (1), 91-109.
• Gillis, W.E., J.G. Combs, and X. Yin, (2020). Franchise management capabilities and franchisor performance under alternative franchise ownership strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(1): p. 105899.
• Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.,( 2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing heory and Practice 19 (2), 139e151.
• Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2011). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. In Handbook of partial least squares. Pp. 713-715, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Hui, Z., He-Cheng, W., & Min-Fei, Z. (2015). Partnership management, supply chain collaboration, and firm innovation performance: an empirical examination. International Journal of Innovation Science, 7(2), 127–138.
• Hung, K. P., & Chou, C. (2013). The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence. Technovation, 33(10–11), 368–380.
• Jiao, J., Xu, Y., Li, J. (2021). The evolution of a collaboration network and its impact on innovation performance under the background of government-funded support: an empirical study in the Chinese wind power sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 915–935.
• Kiraz, A., Onur Canpolat, Enes Furkan Erkan, Fatih Albayrak, (2018). Evaluating R&D Projects Using Two Phases Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods. European Journal of Science and Technology, 14, pp. 49-53.
• Lasagni, A., 2012. How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs? New evidence for Europe. Journal of small business management, 50(2), pp.310-339.
• Lee Sungjoo, Park, G. Yoon, B and Park, J, (2015). Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model, Research Policy (30) , pp. 290- 300.
• Lee, K., Jeong, Y., & Yoon, B., (2017). Developing an research and development (R&D) process improvement system to simulate the performance of R&D activities. Computers in Industry, 92, 178-193.
• Liu, L. (2021). Research on the Influence of R&D Models on the Performance of High-Tech Start-Ups. In 6th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2020) (pp. 909-914). Atlantis Press.
• Lloyd-Walker, B.M., A.J. Mills, and D.H. Walker, (2014). Enabling construction innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 32(3): p. 229-245.
• Love, P.E., D. Mistry, and P.R. Davis, (2010). Price competitive alliance projects: Identification of success factors for public clients. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9): p. 947-956.
• Mesa, H.A., K.R. Molenaar, and L.F. Alarcón, (2018). Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7): p. 1089-1101.
• Nieto, M. J. and Santamaria, L., (2007). The Importance of Diverse Collaborative Networks for The Novelty of Product Innovation, Technovation, 27(6), pp. 367-377.
• Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2010). Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of small business management, 48(1), 44-69.
• Rebiy, E.Y., Boris, O.A. and Lepyahova, E.N., (2021). Selection of Innovative Projects for Technical and Technological Development within Network Management Structure Environment at Industrial Enterprises. Socio-economic Systems: Paradigms for the Future, pp.709-719.
• Rowlinson, S., et al., (2006). Alliancing in Australia—No-litigation contracts: A tautology? Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132(1): p. 77-81.
• Saunila, M., (2019). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.
• Van Elk, Roel, ter Weel, B., van der Wiel, K. and Wouterse, B., (2019). Estimating the Returns to Public R&D Investments: Evidence from Production Function Models. De Economist, 167(1), pp.45-87.
• Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of Partial Leastmquares, Springer, Germany: Berlin.
• Walker, D. and B. Lloyd-Walker, (2011). Profiling professional excellence in alliance management summary study report. Sydney, Alliancing Association of Australasia, 36.
• Wang, L., Wang, Y., Lou, Y. and Jin, J., (2020). Impact of different patent cooperation network models on innovation performance of technology-based SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(6), pp.724-738.
• Wang, Y. and N. Rajagopalan, (2015). Alliance capabilities: Review and research agenda. Journal of management, 41(1): p. 236-260.
• Wen, J., Qualls, W.J. and Zeng, D., (2021). To explore or exploit: The influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes. Technovation, 100, p.102178.
• Ynalvez, M., Shrum, W., (2011). Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country. Research Policy 40: 204–216.
• Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. http://doi.org/10,1016/j.technovation.2009,08,003.