ارائه الگوی دیدبانی فناوری در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان جمهوری اسلامی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد یار، گروه آینده پژوهی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی(ره)،

2 کارشناسی ارشد، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران. نویسنده مسئول

چکیده

دنیای فناوری کنونی به‌طور پیوسته در حال دگرگونی است؛ بنابراین آگاهی از این تحولات و تغییرات، پاسخ مناسب و هماهنگی میان آنها از کلیدی‌ترین دغدغه‌های اکثر سازمان‌ها به‎شمار می‌آید. جهت رفع این چالش، سازمان‌ها به دیدبانی و پیاده‌سازی اقدامات مقتضی جهت رویارویی با این تحولات فناورانه نیاز دارند. از این‌رو، هدف تحقیق حاضر ارائه الگوی دیدبانی فناوری در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان با استفاده از تکنیک‌های جدید تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره است. همچنین، برای استخراج عوامل موثر از مطالعات کتابخانه ای و پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. سپس براساس نظرات خبرگان عوامل مشابه با همدیگر ادغام‌شده و 26 عامل مشخص‌شده‌اند. همچنین، جهت تعیین وزن شاخص‌ها از تکنیک «سوآراء» و اولویت‌بندی گزینه‌ها از تکنیک «واسپاس» استفاده‌شده است. بعد از استخراج و شناسایی عوامل کلیدی براساس نظرات 30 نفر از خبرگان، اقدام به ارائه الگوی تحقیق شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد شاخص فناوری‌های توانمندساز با ضریب اهمیت 108/0 رتبه اول، سپس شاخص‌های قوانین و مقررات حاکم، تدوین راهبردهای سازمانی در سازمان به ترتیب رتبه‌های دوم و سوم را به خود اختصاص داده‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Present the technology scouting Pattern in knowledge-based organizations of the Islamic Republic of Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Eynollah Keshavarz Turk 1
  • parvaneh gholipoor 2
1 . Assistant Professor of Futures Study, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University,
2 . M.sc, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting Engineering Branch, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University
چکیده [English]

The world of technology is constantly changing today. So, awareness of these developments and changes, appropriate response, and coordination between them is one of the key concerns of most organizations. To address this challenge, organizations also need to monitor and implement appropriate measures to deal with these technological developments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a model of technology scouting in knowledge-based organizations using new multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Also, library studies and questionnaires have been used to extract the effective factors. After extracting and identifying the key factors based on the opinions of 30 experts, the model has been presented. Then, with the formation of the panel of experts, similar factors were merged and 26 factors were identified. Also, the technique of SWARA use to determine the weight of the indicators, and prioritizing the options has been used the WASPAS. Among the strengths of this model are the main influential organizational, environmental, and technological factors and their sub-components. The results showed that the index of empowering technologies with a coefficient of the importance of 0.108 has the first rank, then the indices of governing laws and regulations, strategy development, and organizational strategies in the organization have the second and third ranks, respectively
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Multi-criteria decision-making techniques
  • SWARA technique
  • WASPS technique
  • Technology Scouting
  • knowledge-based organizations

مراجع

  • فهرست منابع و مآخذ

    منابع انگلیسی

    • Adejumo, O. O. Adejumo, A. V. & Aladesami, T. (2020). Technology-driven growth and inclusive growth-implications for sustainable development in Africa. Technology in Society, 101373.‏
    • Adema, K. L. & Roehl, W. S. (2010). Environmental scanning the future of event design. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(2), 199-207.
    • Arora, A. & Cohen, W. M. (2015). Public support for technical advance: the role of firm size. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(4), 791-802.‏
    • Baker, David (2004), the Strategic Management of Technology, Chandos Publication, Oxford, UK.
    • Birkinshaw, Julian & Monteiro, Felipe (2007). External Knowledge Sourcing: Uncovering the Technology Scouting Process, Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) in corporation with Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM), Research Working Paper Series.
    • Brenner, M.(1996). Technology intelligence and technology scouting Competitive Intelligence Review, 7(3), 20-27.
    • Bushehri, Alireza, Nazarizadeh, Farhad. (2012). A Review of Patterns of Identifying, Evaluating, and Selecting Technology in Organizations (with Emphasis on Emerging and Founding Technologies), Tehran, Defense Industries Research and Training Institute (in Persian).
    • Cetron, M. J. & Ralph, C. A. (1971). Industrial applications of technological forecasting.‏
    • Chakraborty, S. & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatics, 25(1), 1-20.‏
    • Choo, C. W. (2001). Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning. Information Research, 7(1), 7-1.‏
    • Choo, C. W. (2003). The art of scanning the environment. Reframing Environmental Scanning, 7.‏
    • Day, G. S. & Schoemaker, P. J. (2005). Scanning the periphery. Harvard business review, 83(11), 135.‏
    • Dehnavi, A. Aghdam, I. N. Pradhan, B. & Varzandeh, M. H. M. (2015). A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran. Catena, 135, 122-148.‏
    • Donbesuur, F. Ampong, G. O. A. Owusu-Yirenkyi, D. & Chu, I. (2020). Technological innovation, organizational innovation and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120252.
    • Durand, Thomas.(2010). Technology Intelligence, In: V.K Narayanan, & G, O’Connor (eds.) Encyclopedia of Technology & Innovation Management, edited by, Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Fahey, L. King, W. R. & Narayanan, V. K. (1981). Environmental scanning and forecasting in strategic planning—the state of the art. Long range planning, 14(1), 32-39.‏
    • Flor, M. L. Oltra-Mestre, M. J. & Sanjurjo, E. L. (2019). An analysis of open innovation strategies in firms in low and medium technology industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.‏
    • Guemes-Castorena David. (2009). Megatrend methodology to identify development opportunities. In PICMET'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, pp. 2391-2396. IEEE.
    • Heidari Dehwi Jalil, Hosseini Dehshiri Seyed Jalaluddin.(2018). Selection of project manager based on competency model using combined methods of Soara and Vaspas (Case study: Sikas project of Pishgaman Kavir Yazd Park). Management Research in Iran, 22 (4): 47-72(in Persian).
    • Hossein Safari; Alieh Kazemi; Ahmad Mehrpour Layeghi (2018). Evaluating the performance of the operational areas of the gas transmission company using the combined method of data envelopment analysis, Soara and Vaspas, Journal of Allameh Tabatabai University, 16, 49, 139-171(in Persian).
    • identification of business opportunities (TEFMIBO). In 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, pp. 1299-1313.
    • Jahanpour, Kiarash. (2011). Technology Watch with IT Tools, Technology Growth, 7, 28, 61-69 (in Persian).
    • Jin, Zh (2005). Global Technological Change: from Hard Technology to Soft Technology, (Translated to English by Kelvin W. Willoughby), Intellect pub
    • Junpeng, Yuan; Donghua, Zhu; Junfeng, Li.(2004).A study on technology monitoring based on text mining to support science and technology management, World engineers convention, Shanghai, China, November 2-6.
    • Kaplan, R. S. (2005). How the balanced scorecard complements the McKinsey 7‐S model. Strategy & leadership.‏
    • Kerr, C. & Phaal, R. (2018). Directing the technology intelligence activity: An ‘information needs’ template for initiating the search. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134, 265-276.‏
    • Keršuliene, V. Zavadskas, E. K. & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of business economics and management, 11(2), 243-258.‏
    • Kujawa, K. A. & Paetzold, K. (2019). External Technology Searching Methods-A Literature Review. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1, 1, 2259-2268, Cambridge University Press.‏
    • Lichtenthaler, E.(2007). Managing technology intelligence processes in situations of radical technological change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74, 1109–1136
    • Martin, B (1995). Foresight in Science and Technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 7, pp. 139-68
    • Matschy, Alexandra (2010). Using Chinese universities as a source of technology scouting, Thesis, Tutor: professorSigvaldHarryson, Linnaeus University, School of Business & Economics, Master of Science.
    • Mir Shahvelayati, F., & Nazarizadeh, F. (2019). Technology Scouting Model: A Process & Structure for Monitoring Technological Changes. Defensive Future Study Researches Journal, 4(13), 41-68.‏
    • Mirshah Velayati, Farzaneh and Farhad Nazarizadeh (2011). Environmental scan, Tehran, Defense Industries Educational and Research Institute Publications (in Persian).
    • Mirshah Velayati, Farzaneh and Farhad Nazarizadeh (2013). Environmental scanning is a tool for creating opportunities and dealing with uncertainty conditions. Comparing environmental scanning experiences in three industrial and service companies, presented at: 10th International Conference on Strategic Management, Tehran (in Persian).
    • onteiro, F. L (2008). Connecting the Dots: Uncovering the Technology Scouting Process, London Business School, Sussex Place, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4SA, United Kingdom.
    • Mortara, L., Kerr, C.I.V., Phaal, R., Probert, D.R.. (2009) .A toolbox of elements to build technology intelligence systems, International Journal Of Technology Management, 47, 322-345.
    • Myers, K. (1999). Technology for the environmental scanning process. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(4), 409-424.‏
    • Narchal, R. M., Kittappa, K., & Bhattacharya, P. (1987). An environmental scanning system for business planning. Long Range Planning, 20(6), 96-105.‏
    • Nezamipour, Qadir; Tabaian, Seyed Kamal; Elahi, Seyed Majid; Nazemi, Amir; Mira Shah Velayati, Farzaneh. (2016). Introduction of surveillance criteria as a tool for future research, Quarterly Journal of Defense Strategy, 1 (14), 53: 137-171(in Persian).
    • Ngamk roeckjoti, C., & Speece, M. (2008). Technology turbulence and environmental scanning in Thai food new product development. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 413-432.‏
    • Nosella, A., Petroni, G., & Salandra, R. (2008). Technological change and technology monitoring process: Evidence from four Italian case studies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,25(4), 321-337.‏
    • Nyberg, A & Palmgren, S (2011). Using Indicators for Technology Monitoring Steps toward a proposed framework,(MSc Thesis), Chalmers University, Retrieved from http://www.essays.se/essay/079df8c027/
    • Radicic, D. (2020). National and international R&D support programmers and technology scouting in European small and medium enterprises. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.‏
    • Robinson, D. K., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 267-285.‏
    • Rohrbeck, R (2007). Technology Scouting: a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, ISPIM-Asia Conference, New Delhi, India
    • Rohrbeck, R., & Bade, M. (2012). Environmental scanning, futures research, strategic foresight and organizational future orientation: a review, integration, and future research directions. In ISPIM Annual Conference.‏
    • Romero, G. R; Güemes-Castorena, David; Villarreal, A .(2012) .Technology Management for Emerging Technologies Technological Foresight Model for the Identification of Business Opportunities (TEFMIBO), Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies, July 29- August 2, Vancouver, Canada
    • Rouach, D and Santi, P (2001). Competitive Intelligence Adds Value: Five Intelligence Attitudes, European Management Journal, 19, 5, 552–559.
    • Saberfard, Alireza (2013). Monitoring, analysis, estimation of information and intelligence of science and technology: a strategic necessity in the information society of N.M., Quarterly Journal of Security Research, 5, 45-70(in Persian).
    • Sadegh Abedi, Esmaeil Mofrad Bushehri, Seyed Ali Asghar Tavassolian, Ali Hassani (2016). Investigating the Factors Affecting Technology Monitoring Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Qazvin Gas Company, 3rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Productivity and Quality, https://civilica.com/doc/1041321(in Persian).
    • Schuh, G., & Kabasci, P. (2014). Why do companies use technology scanning?. In ISPIM Innovation Symposium (p. 1). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).‏
    • Schuh, G., & König, C. (2017). Determination of information demand for efficient technology monitoring. In Proceedings of the 26th Intern association for management of technology conf., ASMET, Wien (pp. 851-865).‏
    • Shahmiri, Farhad and Amanpour, Nasser. (2013). Providing a Conceptual Framework for Identifying Appropriate Tools for Developing Innovation Strategies by Integrating Innovation Decision Making Capabilities and Methods, Technology Development Quarterly, 9, 36, 62-69(in Persian).
    • Sharda, Manish &Sajja, PritiSrinivas (2007). Knowledge Scouting Process in Semantic web Environment, ADIT Journal of Engineering, 4, 1, 23-26.
    • Soete, L. (2019). Science, technology and innovation studies at a crossroad: SPRU as case study. Research Policy, 48(4), 849-857.‏
    • Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 26(2), 181-187.‏
    • Tajudeen, F. P., Jaafar, N. I., & Sulaiman, A. (2019). External Technology Acquisition and External Technology Exploitation: The Difference of Open Innovation Effects. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), 97.
    • Tari, Mahdieh; Moradi, Mahmoud; Ebrahimpour, Mostafa. (2015). Investigating the factors affecting the growth and success of knowledge-based companies, Technology Growth Quarterly, 45, 37-44 (in Persian).
    • Vecchiato, R & Roveda, C (2010). Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: Handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, vol. 77, pp. 1527–1539.
    • Wang, C. H., & Quan, X. I. (2019). The Role of External Technology Scouting in Inbound Open Innovation Generation: Evidence From High-Technology Industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.‏
    • Wang, C. H., Quarr, X. I., & Tsai, M. C. (2018). Enriching innovation generation through external technology scouting in an uncertain technological environment. In 2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference, 1-7, IEEE.‏
    • White, Margaret & Bruton, Garry (2007). The Management of Technology and Innovation: A Strategic approch, Thomson South Western, Canada.
    • Yu, J., Liu, R., & Chen, F. (2020). Linking institutional environment with technological change: The rise of China's flat panel display industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119852.‏
    • Zawislak, P. A., Cherubini Alves, A., Tello-Gamarra, J., Barbieux, D., & Reichert, F. M. (2012). Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of technology management & innovation, 7(2), 14-27.‏

     

مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی دفاع ملی
دوره 6، شماره 23
آذر 1401
صفحه 175-204

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار