1
. Doctor of Strategic Defense Sciences and Future War Researcher
2
t
Abstract
One of the factors to create value in value chain is creating logical connection between members of value chain and also measurements that increase production efficiency, processing and marketing. In this study in addition to review and analyze dimensions, macro components and micro components of value chain of garden products with the resistive approach in status quo and desirable situation, strategic prepositions were reviewed to create and increase value in chain. In this study qualitative and quantitative methods have been used to realize the goals of the research and in addition to review the existing literature and comparative study of 10 countries and also interview with gardening experts, industry and logistic experts, dimensional indicators and components of value chain of garden products have been evaluated using Likert scale. Findings of the study shows that among the dimensions of chain, the dimensions of underlying factors include policy making of the government and support NGOs, logistic and inventory, science and technology, climate and the environment. It had the most difference of the status quo and desirable situation and among micro components, logistic and inventory chain had the most difference between the status quo and desirable situation. Paying attention to transportation and inventory, careful look at science and technology at monitoring its effects on value creation and also structural reform, agility of bureaucratic systems, not quick change of laws and instructions and clarification are some recommendations of the author
ابطحی سید حسین، صلواتی عادل(1384)، مدیریت دانش. مدیریت و توسعه، صص 65-53.
مهدی ابزری و همکاران(1390). بررسی شکاف بین وضعیت موجود و مطلوب مدیریت دانش در صنعت خودرویایران، مدیریت دولتی دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، دوره3 شماره 6 بهار و تابستان 1390 صص 19تا 34
ب. منابع لاتین
Andre Devaux, Maximo Torero, Jason Donovan, Douglas Horton, (2018). "Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review", Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Vol. 8 Issue: 1, pp.99-123
Berdegue, J.A., Bebbington, A. and Escobal, A. (2015). “Conceptualizing spatial diversity in Latin American rural development: structures, institutions, and coalitions”, World Development,Vol. 73, September, pp. 1-10.
Donovan, J. and Poole, N. (2014). “Changing asset endowments and smallholder participation in higher value markets: evidence from certified coffee producers in Nicaragua”, Food Policy, Vol. 44, pp. 1-13.
Donovan, J., Franzel, S., Cunhja, M., Gyau, A. and Mithofer, D. (2015). “Guides for value chain development: a comparative review”, Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 2-23.
Eueng A (1999). Organizational learning capability. NewYork: Oxford University Press Inc.
Gopal Naik , D.N. Suresh Challenges of creating sustainable agri-retail supply chains Received 9 August 2017; revised form 6 November 2017; accepted 10 January 2018; Available online 13 April 2018
Hammad Badar A (2014). Value Chain Performance Improvement for Sustainable Mango Industry Development in Pakistan thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of Agriculture and Food Sciences
Kilelu, C., Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. (2013). “Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme”, Agricultural Systems, Vol. 118, June, pp. 65-77.
Minot, N. and Sawyer, B. (2016). “Contract farming in developing countries: theory, practice, and policy implications”, in Devaux, A., Torero, M., Horton, D. and Donovan, J. (Eds), Innovation for Inclusive Value Chain Development: Successes and Challenges, International Food PolicyResearch Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 127-155.
Pant, L. and Hambly, H. (2009). “Innovation systems in renewable natural resource management and sustainable agriculture: a literature review”, African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 103-135.
Schut, M., Andersson, J., Dror, I., Kamanda, J., Sartas, M., Mur, R., Kassam, S., Brouwer, H., Stoian, D.,Devaux, A., Velasco, C., Gramzow, A., Dubois, T., Flor, R.J., Gummert, M., Buizer, D., McDougall, C.,Davis, K., Homann-Kee Tui, S. and Lundy, M. (2017). Innovation Platforms in Agricultural Research for Development: Guidelines for Research, Development, and Funding Agencies on how to Design, Budget, and Implement Successful Innovation Platforms, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Wageningen University under the CGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Banana, Kigali.
Stoian, D., Donovan, J., Fisk, J. and Muldoon, M. (2012), “Value chain development for rural poverty reduction: a reality check and a warning”, Enterprise Development & Microfinance, Vol. 23 No. 1,pp. 54-69.
Swaans, K., Cullen, B., van Rooyen, A., Adekunle, A., Ngwenya, H., Lema, Z. and Nederlof, S. (2013).“Dealing with critical challenges in African innovation platforms: lessons for facilitation”, Knowledge Management for Development Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 116-135.
iazi Shahraki, S. N., & Mobini, A. (2019). Review challenges of value chain of garden products with resistive economy approach through comparing the status quo and desirable situation. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 3(10), 129-148.
MLA
Safdar N iazi Shahraki; Ali Mobini. "Review challenges of value chain of garden products with resistive economy approach through comparing the status quo and desirable situation", Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 3, 10, 2019, 129-148.
HARVARD
iazi Shahraki, S. N., Mobini, A. (2019). 'Review challenges of value chain of garden products with resistive economy approach through comparing the status quo and desirable situation', Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 3(10), pp. 129-148.
VANCOUVER
iazi Shahraki, S. N., Mobini, A. Review challenges of value chain of garden products with resistive economy approach through comparing the status quo and desirable situation. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge, 2019; 3(10): 129-148.
)
