An Islamic Model for Compensation in Comprehensive Crisis Management: The Perspective of Imam Khomeini

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD in Islamic Theology, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Qom, Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author). Email: amir.s.jafari@gmail.com

2 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Islamic Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

This study aims to present a governance model for compensation that is derived from Islamic sources and jurisprudential methods while incorporating analyzable experiences and case studies. Utilizing a grounded theory approach and qualitative analysis of Imam Khomeini’s (RA) statements in the field of crisis management, the research develops a model based on the interaction between individuals and the government within the framework of Islamic values and principles. Six components, public cooperation and participation, social justice, order and coordination, security and tranquility, patience and resilience, and media coverage, are identified as critical elements in the compensation strategy. The model emphasizes the role of citizens’ participation under governmental guidance, a strategic approach to social justice, coordination between the people and the government in implementing compensation processes, ensuring security and tranquility in affected areas, promoting individual patience and resilience to withstand the time-consuming nature of infrastructure restoration, and realistic media coverage to foster informed engagement among affected populations.

Keywords

References

  • خمینی، روح‌الله (1379). صحیفه امام(ره) ، مجلدات 5 تا 11 و 13 تا 17 و 20 و 21، تهران: موسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی(ره).
  • حسینی، مازیار (1387). مدیریت بحران، تهران: سازمان پیشگیری و مدیریت بحران شهر تهران.
  • درابک، توماس؛ هواتمر، جرالد (1382). مدیریت بحران: اصول و راهنمای عملی برای دولت‌های محلی، تهران: مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران.
  • سید جعفری، امیر؛ بهشتی مهر، احمد (1400). بررسی الگوی اسلامی مشارکت مردمی در مدیریت جامع بحران از دیدگاه امام خمینی، مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی دفاع ملی، 5(19)، 342-368.
  • کوربین، جولیت؛ استرس، آنسلم (1385). اصول روش تحقیق کیفی: نظریه مبنایی، رویه‌ها و شیوه‌ها، ترجمه بیوک محمدی؛ تهران. پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.

References

  • Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post‐disasterrecovery, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  • Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience, American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–
  • Barkaun M, (1974). Disaster and the Milleniume, New Haven, Yale university press.
  • Begg, C. (2018). Power, responsibility and justice: A review of local stakeholder participation in European flood risk management, Local Environment, 23(4), 383–
  • Bolin, B., & Kurtz, L. C. (2018). Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability, In H. Rodriguez, W. Donner, & J. E. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (2nd ed., pp. 181–203). Springer.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital, In A. H. Halsey, H. Launder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy and society (pp. 46–58). Oxford University Press.
  • Canton, Lucien G. (2001). Emergency Management: Concepts and Strategies for Effective Programs, New Jersey, John Wiley Sons Inc, Hoboleen.
  • Creswell, John W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Boston, Pearson Education.
  • Denzin NK. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • Glaser, B G, Strauss, A L, (1967). the Discovery of the Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, New Brunswick and London, Aldin Transacion Publishers.
  • Goulding, C. (1998). Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research, An International Journal, 1(1), 50–57.
  • Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of the process and challenge of grounded theory analysis, Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.
  • Izzo, A. (2003). Verstehen and the unconscious: A historical overview. In R. Boudon, M. Cherkaoui, & P. Demeulenaere (Eds.), The European tradition in qualitative research (pp. 393–408). London, England: SAGE.
  • Krüger, M. (2019). Building instead of imposing resilience: Revisiting the relationship between resilience and the state, International Political Sociology, 13(1), 53–
  • Lee J, (2001). A Grounded Theory: Integration and Internalization in ERP Adoption and Use, Lincoln, ETD Collection for University of Nebreska.
  • Locke, K. (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 239–245.
  • Moore, T, (2008). Disaster and Emergency Mangement, London, UK BSI.
  • Neuman, L, (1977). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Boston Allyn and Bacon.
  • Parthasarathy, D. (2018). Inequality, uncertainty, and vulnerability: Rethinking governance from a disaster justice perspective, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(3), 422–
  • Powell, R, (1999). Recent Trends in Research: A mthodological Essay, Library and Information Science, vol.21, Issue.1.
  • Putnam R, (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy, Princeton, Princeton university press.
  • Sousa, C A, Hendriks, P H, (2006). The Need for Grounded Theory in Developing Aknowledge-Based View of Organization Methods, Vol.9, Issue.3.
  • Staupe‐Delgado, R., & Kruke, B. I. (2018). Preparedness: Unpacking and clarifying the concept, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(2), 212–
  • Tierney, K. J. (2019). Disasters: A sociological approach, Polity Press.
  • United Nations (UN). (2009). UNISDR terminology for disaster risk reduction.
Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge
Volume 9, Issue 35
December 2025
Pages 303-332

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics