Validation of the University Social Responsibility Model with Emphasis on Entrepreneurial Orientation Components

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Entrepreneurship Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author) Email: Dr.tsohrabi@gmail.com

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to validate the university social responsibility model with an emphasis on entrepreneurial orientation components. A mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative techniques, was employed for modeling. The statistical population in the qualitative phase consisted of 10 entrepreneurship experts and specialized faculty members from the Central Tehran Branch of Islamic Azad University. A snowball sampling method was used. In the quantitative phase, the population included 52 staff members of the Central Tehran Branch of Islamic Azad University, selected through cluster sampling. Data collection tools in the qualitative stage comprised systematic document review and semi-structured in-depth interviews, whose reliability was confirmed through inter-coder agreement. In the quantitative stage, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) was applied to categorize and level the constructs. Data analysis was conducted through three stages of coding (open, axial, and selective) using MAXQDA2020 software. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to validate the relationships among the components. The findings indicated that university social responsibility encompasses five dimensions: (1) legal responsibility, (2) social responsibility, (3) economic responsibility, (4) ethical responsibility, and (5) environmental responsibility, covering a total of 12 components. The external model of university social responsibility, emphasizing entrepreneurial orientation, demonstrated a very high predictive quality. Ultimately, a framework was introduced to provide university managers and decision-makers with recommendations for facilitating the implementation of social responsibility and entrepreneurship programs within higher education institutions.

Keywords


  • فهرست منابع

    • امتیاز، سمیه (1398). تأثیر گرایش کارآفرینانه بر عملکرد: بررسی نقش تعدیلگری استراتژی (مطالعه موردی: صنعت مواد شوینده) پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
    • الوانی، مهدی؛ قسمی، احمدرضا (1400). مدیریت و مسئولیت‌های اجتماعی سازمان، نوبت اول، تهران، انتشارات مرکز آموزش مدیریت دولتی.
    • بحری­پور، امیرحسین؛ طالبی، ابوتراب (1402). سوگیری در مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی شهروندان و عوامل مؤثر بر آن. مطالعه موردی شهروندان شهر کاشان. فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی - شماره 66 پاییز 1393. صص 32-77
    • رحیمیان، نظام‌الدین؛ کاظم­پور، مرتضی (1397). مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی شرکت‌ها: مفاهیم، ابعاد، نظریه­ها و مروری بر مدل‌های آن. نشریه پژوهش حسابداری. دوره 8. شماره 4. صص 152-175
    • رحیم­نیا، فریبرز؛ سجاد، عاطفه (1394). تأثیر جهت‌گیری‌های راهبردی بر عملکرد شرکت‌های مستقر در پارک علم و فناوری خراسان به‌واسطه نوآوری سازمانی. مدیریت نوآوری 78-114
    • راه چمنی، احمد؛ کاوسی، کامیار (1400). تأثیر ابعاد مسئولیت اجتماعی سازمان و اعتماد مصرف‌کننده بر شهرت سازمان، دو فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانشگاه شاهد، راهبردهای بازرگانی، سال بیستم، شماره 5.
    • شربتیان، محمد حسن؛ میامی، حسن (1398). تأملی بر فرایند جامعه‌پذیری مسئولیت اجتماعی جوانان. مجله مهندسی فرهنگی، سال هفتم شماره 74-73.
    • عابد جعفری، حسن (1400). تحلیل مضمون و شبکه مضامین: روشی ساده و کارآمد برای تبیین الگوهای موجود در داده‌های کیفی، دو فصلنامه اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، س 5، ش 2، شماره پیاپی 10، صص 151-198
    • نیکومرام، هاشم؛ حیدرزاده، کامبیز (1399). ارزیابی نقش گرایش کارآفرینانه، ساختار سازمانی و بازارگرایی بر عملکرد کسب‌وکار شرکت‌های تولیدی (شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار)، مجله مدیریت بازاریابی. 1(1)، 50- 5.
    • نیومن ویلیام لارنس (1394). روش‌های پژوهش اجتماعی: رویکردهای کیفی و کمی، ترجمه دکتر ابوالحسن فقیهی و عسل آغاز، تهران: ترمه، ج 1 و 2.
    • نورا، عباس (1400). بررسی تأثیر کارآفرینی سازمانی و راهبردی شرکت‌های لبنی خراسان رضوی بر میزان گرایش آن‌ها به بین‌المللی شدن، فصلنامه رویکردهای پژوهشی نوین در مدیریت و حسابداری، شماره 39، ص 41-60.

     

    References

    • Arntzen, A.A.B. (2024). Knowledge, technology and university social responsibility (USR): A conceptual framework. Eduardo Tome (Editor). Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Knowledge Management, 2-3 Septembet 2010. 74-81.
    • Atakan, S. M.G., & Eker, T. Corporate identity of a socially responsible university: A case from the Turkish higher education sector. Journal of business Ethic (1), 55-68.
    • Adomako Samuel, Robert A. Opoku, Kwabena Frimpong.(2021). Entrepreneurs' improvisational behavior and new venture performance: Firm-level and institutional contingencies, Journal of Business Research, Volume 83, February 2021.
    • Banyasady, A., Sefidkhosh, M., Bagheri, K., and Sajjadi, M. (2023). “Human activism and the social mission of the truth-seeking university in the Enlightenment and the Romantic era”. Journal of Philosophical Investigations (University of Tabriz), 14(30), pp. 38-55. doi: 10.22034/ jpiut.2024.33065.2302.
    • Bliemel, M. L. (2014). Lessons learned from an inside-out flip in entrepreneurship education. Small Enterprise Research,21(1), 117–128.
    • Burton, M. D., Sørensen, J. B., & Dobrev, S. D. (2016). A careers perspective on entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 40(2), 237–247.
    • Baron, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3),683-717.
    • Canziani, B. F., Welsh, Dianne H.B., (2024). How entrepreneurship influences other disciplines: An examination of learning goals, The International Journal of Management Education.
    • Casa-Nova, M. J. (2024). “Universities inside the world: multiscale engagement levels”. In Kövér, Á. and and Franger, G. (Eds.), University and Society Interdependencies and Exchange. Coburg,  Germany: Edward Elgar publishing.
    • Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2016). The activities of university knowledge transfer offices: Towards the third mission in Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 753-777.
    • Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P., 1991. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ET&P), 16(1), pp. 7-25.
    • Coelho Márcia and Menezes Isabel (2021). University Social Responsibility, Service Learning, and Students' Personal, Professional, and Civic Education, Front. Psychol., 25 February 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617300.
    • Cuesta-Valiño, P., Rodríguez, P. G., Núñez-Barriopedro, E. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty in hypermarkets: A new socially responsible strategy. Proceedings of the First International Management Conference, Future, Entrepreneurship and Industry in Higher Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    • Dess, G. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship of institutional factors.The Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 147-156.
    • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 29 (2), 2119.
    • Fuentelsaz, L., Maricas, J. & Monteri, J. (2018). Entrepreneurs and Innovation: the contingent role of institutional factors. International small business Journal, 36 (4).
    • Gyurova, V. & Zeleeva, V. (2024). “The knowledge and skills of the century teachers. In R. Valeeva”. (Ed). The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioral Sciences.Vol. XXIX. Russia, Kazan Federal University: Future Academy. Pp: 282- 291
    • Huang, K. P. and Wang, K.Y., (2011).The moderating effect of social capital and environmental dynamism on the link between entrepreneurial orientation and resource acquisition, The journal of Quality & quantity
    • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2021). ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility. Available in: http://iso26000.info/.
    • Henseler , J., Ringle, Ch. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Advertising Research: Basic Concepts and Recent Issues. Handbook of research on international advertising,Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1-543
    • Kövér, Á., and and Franger, G. (Eds.).University and Society: Interdependencies and Exchange. Coburg, Germany: Edward Elgar publishingEdward elgar.
    • Marumo, Keishi (2023). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ jos.
    • Moss, S. Prosser, H. Costello, H. Simpson, N. Patel, P. Rowe, S. & Hatton, C. (1998) “Reliability and Validity of the PAS‐ADD Checklist for Detecting Psychiatric Disorders in Adults with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 42 (2): 173-183.
    • Nunez, I. (2024). Aprendizaje-servicio y rendimiento académico del alumnado universitário. La evaluación de um programa (dissertation). Universidade Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
    • Peterson, D. K. (2024) «The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment «, Journal of Business & Society ، 43, No 3, pp: 296–319.
    • Ritala, P., Henttonen, K., Salojärvi, H., Sainio, L. M., & Saarenketo, S. (2013). Gone fishing for knowledge? The effect of strategic orientations on the scope of open knowledge search. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(3), 328-348.
    • Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability, 16(13),5367. Doi: 10.3390/su16135367
    • Salmani, M., & Hajilo, M. (2020). Measuring personality components in the tendency of villagers to entrepreneurship (case study: Khodabande city). Journal of human geography research, 2(5), 437-447.
    • Shafaei Yamchelou, T., Abili, K., and Faramarz Gharamaleki, A. (2021). “Social responsibility in Universities (Case Study: University of Tehran)”.
    • Su, L. Pan, U, Chen, X. Corporate social responsibility: Findings from the Chinese hospitality Industry , Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , 34 PP.240-247
    • Tugce, Z. K. & Koray, K. (2024). “Social studies teacher competencie in 2050: an e-Delphi study”. Eur J Futures Res. 12. N. 4.
    • Tetřevová L, Sabolova V. University stakeholder management and university social responsibility. WSEAS Transact Adv Eng Educ 2018;7(7):224-3
    • Wales, W. J., Covin, J. G., & Monsen, E. (2023). Entrepreneurial orientation: The necessity of a multilevel conceptualization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(4), 639-660.
    • Zgaga, P. (2024). “European higher education reforms and the role of students,” in Preparing Students for Life and Work, eds W. Archer and H. G. Schuetze (Boston, MA: Brill/Sense), 272–288.