Designing a model for promoting the psychological empowerment of human resources based on organizational neuroscience in the headquarters of National Iranian Oil Company

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 . Department of Public Administration, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran.

2 Department of Public Administration, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, and Responsible Author, Email: g.amirnejad@yhoo.com. Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Public Administration, Borujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, Iran.

4 Department of Public Administration, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran

Abstract

The current research was conducted with the aim of designing a model for promoting the psychological empowerment of human resources based on organizational neuroscience at the headquarters of the National Iranian Oil Company. Research in terms of purpose, applied-developmental; And it is considered mixed type (qualitative-quantitative) and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection method. The statistical population of the qualitative section included all scientific articles that have been compiled around the topic of the research, from which 83 articles were selected. In the quantitative part, the statistical population included all the managers and assistants of the human resources management department at the headquarters of the National Iranian Oil Company, from which 15 people were selected in a targeted manner. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of the questionnaire, and its value was 0.790 in this study, and the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed.To analyze the data in the qualitative part of the content analysis, in the quantitative part, Delphi technique was used for confirmation, and interpretive structural modeling was used to stratify the variables. The results led to the identification of 6 dimensions, 20 components and 90 indicators, All indicators were confirmed by experts. In leveling the variables at level 1, the consequences of psychological empowerment and neurohormones; At level 2, empowerment based on organizational neuroscience and empowerment based on cognitive neuroscience; At level 3, psychological empowerment techniques and approaches based on neuro-leadership were leveled. This model can be used as a basis for psychological empowerment of human resources in different organizations.

Keywords

References

  • ابیلی، خ.، مزاری، ا. (1400). مدل خودتوسعه‌ای عصب شناختی رهبران و با تأکید بر رهبران دانشگاهی. مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان‌ها، 10(2)، 79-108.
  • اباذری سیوندی، ع. حقیقی، م. خاشعی، و. محمودزاده، م. (1401). طراحی مدل توانمندسازی منابع انسانی درسازمان ملی استاندارد ایران. آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی. 9 (32).
  • زمانی، ر.، باقرپور ولاشانی، م.ب.، مرادی، م. (1401). تاثیر منبع کنترل درونی بر رابطه توانمندسازی ‌روان‌شناختی حسابرسان و کیفیت حسابرسی. دانش حسابرسی، 22(86)، 119-135.
  • فضایلی گاه، ح.، معقول، ع.، اکبری، ا.، رضایی فر، ح. (1400). شناسایی مؤلفه­های توانمندسازی ‌روان‌شناختی مدیران مدارس آموزش و پرورش شهرستان مشهد. فصلنامه علمی نوآوری‌های مدیریت آموزشی، 17(4)، 59-46.
  • مرادپور طیبی، ب.، حیدری، م.، چنانی، م.، کوچک زایی، م. (1392). مطالعه جایگاه مدیریت منابع انسانی در صنعت نفت کشور، چالش­ها و راهکارهای توسعه سرمایه انسانی در شرکت ملی نفت ایران. کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت چالش­ها و راهکارها، شیراز.
  • منصوری، ا. (1397). کلاف سردرگم چالش­های منابع انسانی صنعت نفت. برگرفته از وبسایت نفت ما، آژانس رویدادهای مهم نفت و انرژی.
  • نیکنامی، م.، عباس پور، ع.، تقوی فرد، م.ت.، اصغری، پ. (1400). روش‌های ارتقاء ابعاد توانمندسازی ‌روان‌شناختی کارکنان سازمان صمت در شرایط اپیدمی کووید 19. مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، 30(102)، 37-35.

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

  • Akşahin, H., Dagli, G., Altinay, F., Altinay, Z., Altinay, M., Soykurt, M., ... & Adedoyin, O. B. (2023). Contributions of Neuroleadership to the School Administrator and Teachers for the Development of Organizational Behavior. Sustainability, 15(21), 15443.
  • Chabot, C. (1995). Defining high Technology. Stanford: Stanford Publication of Stanford University.
  • Balconi, M., Angioletti, L., & Cassioli, F. (2023). Electrophysiology and hyperscanning applied to e-learning for organizational training. The Learning Organization, 30(6), 857-876.
  • Beugré, C. (2020). Management research in Africa: insights from organizational neuroscience. Africa Journal of Management, 6(4), 249-268.
  • Beugré, C. D. (2018). The neuroscience of organizational behavior. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bramble, M., Campbell, S. J., Walsh, K., Prior, S., Doherty, D., Marlow, A., & Maxwell, H. (2022). Examining the engagement of health services staff in change management: modifying the SCARF assessment model. International Practice Development Journal, 12(1), 1-13.
  • Brown, P. , Kingsley, J., & Paterson, S. (2015). The fear free organization: Vital insights from neuroscience to transform your business culture. London: Kogan Page.
  • Butler, M. J., & Senior, C. (2007). Toward an organizational cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 1-17.
  • Cristofaro, M., Giardino, P. L., Malizia, A. P., & Mastrogiorgio, A. (2022). Affect and cognition in managerial decision making: A systematic literature review of neuroscience evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 762993.
  • De la Nuez, H., Nieves, J., & Osorio, J. (2023). Neuroleadership: Affective experiences in the workplace and their influence on employees’ evaluative judgements. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 103554.
  • Forbes-Zeller, L. (2020). What role can social cognitive neuroscience play in promoting prosocial behaviors in organizations. Pepperdine University.
  • Helalat, A., Sharari, H., Qawasmeh, R., Bani-Mustafa, A., & Alkhazali, Z. (2023). Revisiting the relationship between transformational leadership and employee psychological empowerment: A more holistic view using organisational culture. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2254023.
  • Jack, A. I., Rochford, K. C., Friedman, J. P., Passarelli, A. M., & Boyatzis, R. E. (2019). Pitfalls in organizational neuroscience: A critical review and suggestions for future research. Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 421-458.
  • Kasai, K., Kumagaya, S. I., Takahashi, Y., Sawai, Y., Uno, A., Kumakura, Y., ... & Yagishita, S. (2023). “World-Informed” Neuroscience for Diversity and Inclusion: An Organizational Change in Cognitive Sciences. Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 54(6), 560-566.
  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Organization-based self-esteem and meaningful work mediate effects of empowering leadership on employee behaviors and well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 385-398.
  • Lee, J. H. (2020). Neuroscience based human resource management at Midas IT Co. _A case study. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 21(5), 240-248.
  • Lee, N., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). Neuroimaging and psychophysiological measurement in organizational research: an agenda for research in organizational cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 18-42.
  • Llorente-Alonso, M., Garcia-Ael, C., & Topa, G. (2023). A meta-analysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables. Current Psychology, 1-26.
  • Marsh, N., Marsh, A. A., Lee, M. R., & Hurlemann, R. (2021). Oxytocin and the neurobiology of prosocial behavior. The Neuroscientist, 27(6), 604-619.
  • Massaro, S. (2020). The organizational neuroscience of emotions. The Cambridge handbook of workplace affect, 15-36.
  • Nunes, A. R., Gliksberg, M., Varela, S. A., Teles, M., Wircer, E., Blechman, J., & Oliveira, R. F. (2021). Developmental effects of oxytocin neurons on social affiliation and processing of social information. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(42), 8742-8760.
  • Owen, M. (2021). Measuring the immeasurable mind: Where contemporary neuroscience meets the Aristotelian tradition. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Robertson, I. H. (2017). The stress test: Can stress ever be beneficial? Journal of the British Academy, 5, 163–176.
  • Serrat, O. (2021). Paradox and Neuroscience: Emerging Theories of Leadership. In Leading Solutions (pp. 11-17). Springer, Singapore.
  • Shafaei, H. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback treatment on depression, anxiety, stress and abdominal pain in patients with chronic psychosomatic abdominal pains. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(02), 395-395.
  • Suryani, I. (2019). Psychological empowerment, innovative work behavior and job satisfaction. In 3rd International Conference on Accounting, Management and Economics 2018 (ICAME 2018)(pp. 636-643). Atlantis Press.
  • Tewari, S., & Mahapatra, G. P. (2018). Social Neuroscience and HR: An Introductory Perspective. NHRD Network Journal, 11(4), 6-13.
  • Zak, P. J. (2017). The neuroscience of trust: Management behaviours that foster employee engagement. Harvard Business Review, January−February. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-neuroscience-of-trust.
  • Zuberi, M. A., Mahmood, A., & Qureshi, N. M. (2023). Organizational cognitive neuroscience: A step ahead in understanding counterproductive workplace behavior. Human Resources Management and Services, 5(1).

 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics