An Introduction to Behavioral Governance: A Fledgling Theory in Statecraft

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Supreme National Defense University and Responsible Author

2 Professor in Supreme National Defense University

3 Shahid Beheshti school of governance

Abstract

Behavioral governance is a fledgling concept in the evolution of Public Administration toward new public governance and a breakthrough as for researchers and students of Public Administration, Political Science, Sociology, Economics, Law, and also public service providers. Behavioral sciences with an emphasis on humans as the main actor, agent, and client of public decisions at the micro level and the generalization of their behavioral algorithms to the macro level have enriched the vision, action, and character of governance and have also deepened the knowledge of governance.
Governance, like public administration and new public management management, is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge due to the possibility of applying it by rulers to solve the problems of the real world.Behavioral governance while benefiting from all the knowledges used in the discpline of governance, especially neuroscience, cognitive science and behavioral science, and tries to explain human behavior at different levels of governance.
This paper is written in order to articulate (new) behavioral governance as a neo-scientific field in the world. The documentary, investigative and argumentative research methods are applied, and by reviewing the ideas of the field after several semesters of study and discussion with Ph.D. students is an introductory survey to this field of knowledge.

Keywords

References

  • Adam, Christian ;Fernández-i-Marín, Xavier; James, Oliver; Manatschal, Anita; Rapp, Carolin & Thomann, Eva (2021). Differential discrimination against mobile EU citizens: experimental evidence from bureaucratic choice settings, Journal of European Public Policy, 28(5): 742-760, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1912144 .
  • Aleksovska, Marija; Schillemans, Thomas & Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan (2019). Lessons from five decades of experimental and behavioral research on accountability: A systematicliterature review. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(2), 1–18. https://org/10.30636/jbpa.22.66.
  • Alves, Felipe; Bustamante, Christian; Guo, Xing; Kartashova, Katya; Lee, Soyoung; Pugh, Thomas; See, Kurt; Terajima, Yaz and Ueberfeldt ,Alexander(2022). Heterogeneity and Monetary Policy: A Thematic Review. Staff Discussion Paper,Bank of Cananda,1-32.
  • Ansell, Christopher& Torfing, Jacob(editors)(2022). Handbook on Theories of Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Aslinda; Guntur Loer, Muhammad & Akmal Ibrahim, Muhammad (2017). Policy Core Belief in Policy Change. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (AEBMR), volume 43,International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS),42-45.
  • Asya Zhelyazkova & Eva Thomann (2022) ‘I did it my way’: customisationand practical compliance with EU policies, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:3, 427-447, DOI:10.1080/13501763.2020.1859599.
  • Aule, Oravee & Odo, Clara Umealor(2015).New Public Services and Marketization of The Nigerian Public Enterprises:Study of Benu Hotels LTD.Review of Public Administration and Management,4(8):41-50.
  • Belaid, Loubna and Ridde,Valéry (2015). Contextual factors as a key to understanding the heterogeneity of effects of a maternal health policy in Burkina Faso?, Health Policy and Planning,30(3):309–321, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu012.
  • Bevir,Mark & Phillips, Ryan (2016). Genealogies of European governance. Comparative European Politics,15(5): 685–704.
  • Bevir,Mark(2013).A Theory of Governance.Berkely: The Regents of the University of California.
  • Borrelli, L. M., & Lindberg, A. (2018). The creativity of coping: Alternative tales of moral dilemmas among migration control officers. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 4(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2018.093876.
  • Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.; Burgess, Jean; Corbetta, Maurizio; Crawford, Kate; Duflo, Esther; Fogarty, Laurel; Gopnik, Alison; Hanafi, Sari; Herrero, Mario; Hong, Ying-yi; Kameyama, Yasuko; Lee, Tatia M. C.;  Leung, Gabriel M.;  Nagin, Daniel S.;  Nobre, Anna C.; Nordentoft, Merete; Okbay, Aysu; Perfors, Andrew; Rival, Laura M.; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Tungodden, Bertil and Wagner, Claudia(2022). The future of human behaviour research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01275-6.
  • Butler, C., Vis, B.(2022).Heuristics and policy responsiveness: a research agenda. European Political Science.1-26 . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00394-6.
  • Cantarelli, P., Bellé, N., & Belardinelli, P. (2020). Behavioral public HR: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases and debiasing interventions. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18778090.
  • Capano, Giliberto (2020).Policy design and state capacity in the COVID-19 emergency in Italy: if you are not prepared for the (un)expected, you can be only what you already are. Policy and Society, 39(3):326–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783790.
  • Capano, Giliberto and Howlett, Michael (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open , 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568.
  • Charmaz, Kathy;Harris, Scott R. & Irvine, Leslie (2019). The Social Self and Everyday Life: Understanding the World Through Symbolic Interactionism. United Kingdom: Wiley.
  • Compton,Mallory E.;Luetjens, Joannah and 't Hart, Paul (2019).Designing for Policy Success. InternationalReview of Public Policy.1(2):129-146.http://journals.openedition.org/irpp/514 .
  • Crow, D. and Jones, M. (2018) Narratives as tools for influencing policy
  • Policy & Politics,46(2):217–234.DOI:10.1332/030557318X15230061022899.
  • Dahl, R. (1947). The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems. Public Administration Review,7(1),1-11.
  • De Ridder, D., Feitsma, J., Van Den Hoven, M., Kroese, F., Schillemans, T., Verweij, M., … De Vet, E. (2020). Simple nudges that are not so easy. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–19. doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.36.
  • de Sire, Alessandro; Moggio, Lucrezia; Marotta, Nicola; Agostini Francesc; Tasselli,Anna; Drago Ferrante, Vera; Curci Claudio; Calafiore Dario; Ferraro Francesco; Bernetti Andrea; Ozyemisci Taskiran,Ozden, Ammendolia Antonio(2022). Impact of Rehabilitation on Fatigue in Post-COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Applied Sciences, 12(17):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178593.
  • Deth, Jan W., Newton, Kenneth (2021). Foundations of Comparative Politics: Democracies of the Modern World. Singapore: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dery, D. (2018).Problematization. In H. K. Colebatch, & R. Hoppe(Eds.).Handbook on
  • policy, process and governing (pp. 377–396). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Dür, Andreas (2019). How interest groups influence public opinion: Arguments matter more than the sources. European Journal of Political Research,58(2):514-535.doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12298.
  • Ewert, B., Loer, K. and Thomann, E. (2020).Beyond nudge: advancing the state-of-the-art of behavioural public policy and administration.Policy & Politics,xx( xx):1– 21, DOI: 10.1332/030557320X15987279194319
  • Farazmand, A. (2010), Bureaucracy and democracy: a theoretical analysis.Public Organization Review, 10 (3), 245-258.
  • Farrell, C., Hatcher, W., & Diamond, J. (2022). Reflecting on over 100 years of public administration education. Public Administration, 100(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12808.

 

  • Feitsma, J. (2019). Brokering Behaviour Change: The Work of Behavioural Insights Experts in Government. Policy & Politics, 47(1): 37–56. doi:10.1332/030557318x15174915040678.
  • Frederickson, G. (1999).The Repositioning of American Public Administration. Political Science and Politics, 32(4):701–711.
  • Frisch-Aviram, Neomi; Beeri, Itai & Cohen, Nissim (2021).How policy entrepreneurship training affects policy entrepreneurship behavior among street-level bureaucrats – a randomized field experiment. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(5):698-722, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1912146.
  • Goldsmith, Stephen, and William D. Eggers(eds.)(2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Ash Center and Brookings Institution Press.
  • Hallsworth,M., Egan, M., Rutter, J., & McCrae, Y. (eds.)(2018).Behavioural government:Usingbehavioural science to improve how governments make decisions. Behavioural Insights Team.
  • Hansen, M. B., Lindholst, A. C., & Greve, C. (2020). Organizing Marketization. In A. C. Lindholst, & M. B. Hansen (Eds.). Marketization in Local Government: Diffusion and Evolution in Scandinavia and England(pp:21-59).Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32478-0_2.
  • Holmes,Brenton(2011).Citizens' engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Research Paper,No. 1, 1-64.
  • Hood, Christopher C.(1976).The limits of administration. London: Wiley.
  • Hood, Christopher C.(1991).A Public Management for All Seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1): 3–19.
  • Inzlicht, M., Werner, K. M., Briskin, J. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2020). Integrating Models of Self-Regulation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1):1-27. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-061020-105721.
  • Ivania, Maksym and Salerno,Andrea(2021). Governance.In: Valerie Cerra and others (eds), How to Achieve Inclusive Growth.Oxford,online edn, Oxford Academic). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846938.003.0010.
  • Jackson, Stewart; Joff , Lelliott; Brincat, Shannon; Bourne, Josephine and Economou, Nick(2022). Australian Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jann, Werner & Wegrich, Kai (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. In F. Fischer, & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods (pp. 43–62).Routledge.
  • Jones, Bryan D., & Thomas, Herschel F. (2017). The cognitive underpinnings of policy process studies: Introduction to a special issue of cognitive systems research. Cognitive Systems Research, 45, 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.04.003.
  • Karataş, Adnan(2019). Post-New Public Management Paradigm and Its Effects on Public Administration. Social Mentality And Researcher Thinkers Journal,5: 1796-1805. 10.31576/smryj.392.
  • Kearney, Richard & Hays, Steven. (1998). Reinventing Government, The New Public Management and Civil Service Systems in International Perspective: The Danger of Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18. 38-54. 10.1177/0734371X9801800404.
  • Liu Zhiyong,Kirkpatrick,Ian;Chen,Yaru; Mei, Jixia (2021).Overcoming the legacy of marketization : China’s response to COVID-19 and the fast-forward of healthcare BMJ Leader,5(1):42–45.
  • Masefield, Sara C.; Msosa, Alan; Chinguwo, Florence K. & Grugel,Jean(2021). Stakeholder engagement in the health policy process in a low income country: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the challenges to effective inclusion in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res, 21, 984. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07016-9.
  • Mastroianni, Anna C. ; Kahn, Jeffrey P. and Kass, Nancy E.(2019).The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • Mont, Oksana;Lehner, Matthias & Heiskanen, Eva. (2014). Nudging. A tool for sustainable behaviour?. Swedish EPA report 6643:1-86.
  • Morewedge, C. K.; Yoon, H.; Scopelliti, I.; Symborski, C. W.; Korris, J. H.; Kassam, K. S. (2015). "Debiasing Decisions: Improved Decision Making With a Single Training Intervention". Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2 (1): 129–140. doi:10.1177/2372732215600886.
  • Moseley, A., & Thomann, E. (2021). A behavioural model of heuristics and biases in
  • frontline policy implementation. Policy & Politics, 49(1):49–67. https://doi.org/10.1332030557320X15967973532891.
  • Mousavi,Shabnam(2018). What do heuristics have to do with policymaking?. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy,2(1):69-74.
  • Mousavi,Shabnam(2018).What do heuristics have to do with policymaking?.Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy,2(1):69-74.
  • Moynihan, D. (2018). A great schism approaching? Towards a micro and macro public
  • Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1(1):1–8. https://doi.org/
  • 30636/jbpa.11.15.
  • Moynihan, Donald. (2018). A great schism approaching? Towards a micro and macro public administration. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration,1(1),1-8. 10.30636/jbpa.11.15.
  • Mukherjee, I., Coban, M.K. & Bali, A.S.(2021).Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review. Policy Sci, 54:243–268 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09420-8.
  • Naidu,S.P.(2005). Public Administration: Concepts And Theories. New Age International (P) Limited.
  • Osborne, Stephan P. & Gaebler, T. (1993).Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Plume.
  • Osborne, Stephan P.(editor)(2010).The New Public Governance?.Oxon: Routledge.
  • Osborne, Stephen P. (2006). The New Public Governance?. Public Management Review,8(3):377-387, DOI:10.1080/14719030600853022.
  • Pae, Chi-Un(2015). Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review?. Psychiatry Investig,12(3): 417–419.
  • Peters, Guy B., & Pierre,John (2016). Comparative Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peters, Guy B., (2005). “The Problem of Policy Problems”.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,7(4):349-370.
  • Peters, Guy. B. (2005). The problem of policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy
  • Analysis, 7(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980500319204.
  • Pierre,John&Peters, Guy B. (2021). An Advanced Introduction to Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Popoola, Olufemi O.(2016). Actors in Decision Making and Policy Process. J.I.S.S.,5(1):47-51.
  • Porche, Demetrius J. (2021). Health Policy: Application for Nurses and Other Healthcare Professionals. United States: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
  • Sager, Fritz & Gofen, Anat. (2022). The polity of implementation: Organizational and institutional arrangements in policy implementation.Governance.35(2):347–364. 10.1111/gove.12677.
  • Saha, Barsha; Martínez-García, Miguel; Bhattacharya Sharad Nath; Joshi, Rohit (2022).Overcoming Choice Inertia through Social Interaction—An Agent-Based Study of Mobile Subscription Decision. Games,13(47:(1-16.https://doi.org/10.3390/g13030047.
  • Sanbonmatsu, DM, Cooley, EH and Butner, JE (2021). The Impact of Complexity on Methods and Findings in Psychological Science. Frontiers in Psychology,11(580111):1-16.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580111.
  • Sanders, Michael; Snijders, Veerle & Hallsworth, Michael(2018). Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going?. Behavioural Public Policy, 2. 1-24. 10.1017/bpp.2018.17.
  • Scharpf, F. W. (1989). Decision Rules, Decision Styles and Policy Choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1(2), 149–176. doi:10.1177/0951692889001002003.
  • Schneider,Anne L. & Ingram, Helen(1997). Policy design for democracy. Kansas:Universityn Press Of Kansas.
  • Shafritz, J., Russell, E.W., Borick, C., & Hyde, A. (2016). Introducing Public Administration (9th ed.). Routledge.
  • Sijabat,R. (2018).Understanding Behavioral Economics: A Narrative Perspective.Asian Development Policy Review,6(2):77-87.
  • Sparkman,Gregg(2020).Dynamic Norm interventios,how to enable the soread of Positive change.In Walton, Alia J. and Crum, Gregory M. (eds).Handbook of Wise Interventions: How Social Psychology Can Help People Change(429-444). United States: Guilford Publications.
  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin Books.
  • Thomann, Eva(2020). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) for comparative policy
  • In G. Fontaine & B. G. Peters (Eds.).Handbook of research methods and
  • applications in comparative policy analysis (pp. 254–276). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  • Thomann, E., van Engen, N., & Tummers, L. (2018). The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-16mdpwsp7ig531.
  • Tummers, L. (2017). Bureaucracy and policy alienation. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance.1-8. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2715-1.
  • Van Geet, Marijn T.; Verweij, Stefan; Busscher, Tim and Arts, Jos(2021). The importance of policy design fit for effectiveness: a qualitative comparative analysis of policy integration in regional transport planning. Policy Sciences, 54:629–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09429-z.
  • Van Koten, S. (2021). Self-regulation and governmental oversight: a theoretical and experimental study. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 59(2), 161–174. doi:10.1007/s11149-020-09421-0.
  • Vignieri,Vicenzo (2020). Old Public Administration, New Public Management and Public Governance: shifts in dominant modes of Public Administration. Changes and current challenges in Public Administration: a focus on the shifts in management modes of public service organizations, value generation logics of public service delivery, and performance management applied to governance.1-24.
  • Virani, Altaf(2019). Notions of policy effectiveness and implications for policy design: insights from public-private partnerships in India.Policy Design and Practice, 2(2): 198-214.DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2019.1607812.
  • Volckmar-Eeg, M. G., & Vassenden, A. (2022). Emotional creaming: Street-level bureaucrats’ prioritisation of migrant clients ‘likely to succeed’ in labour market integration. International Journal of Social Welfare, 31, 165– 175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12510
  • Weaver, R. K. (2020). Policy dynamics in federal systems: A framework for analysis.
  • Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 50(2), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/

pjaa003.

  • Weimer, Dawid L.and Vining, Aidan R. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
  • Wyman,S M and Eddy,W B(1973). Role of Behavioral Science in Public Administration Programs. Public Administration Review,33(5), 464-467.
  • Young, Alasdair R.; Roederer-Rynning,Christilla; Wallace,Helen & Pollack, Mark A.(2020).Policy-making in the European Union.United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

ج. پایگاه های اینترنتی

  • https://www.nobelprize.org
  • https://holbergprize.org

 

Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge
Volume 7, Issue 26
September 2023
Pages 273-310

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics